#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) is the only survivor when she crash lands on Fiorina 161, a bleak wasteland inhabited by former inmates of the planet’s maximum security prison. Once again, Ripley must face skepticism and the alien as it hunts down the prisoners and guards. Without weapons or modern technology of any kind, Ripley leads the men into battle against the terrifying creature.
Plot: After escaping with Newt and Hicks from the alien planet, Ripley crash lands on Fiorina 161, a prison planet and host to a correctional facility. Unfortunately, although Newt and Hicks do not survive the crash, a more unwelcome visitor does. The prison does not allow weapons of any kind, and with aid being a long time away, the prisoners must simply survive in any way they can.
Smart Tags: #alien #prison #android #cryogenics #cult_film #female_protagonist #sequel #funeral #third_part #dog #orchestral_music_score #blood #death_of_protagonist #creature_feature #outer_space #gore #black_comedy #dark_comedy #stupidity #murder #22nd_century
|6.5/10 Votes: 288,439|
|6.3 Votes: 4160 Popularity: 25.668|
Aliens, a great action movie, cheapened the original by replacing one hyper-intelligent, indestructible monster with an army of gormless critters. This third entry has only one creature, but unfortunately it’s just as gormless. When Ripley (Weaver) crash-lands on a prison planet full of hard-nut slap-heads, they haven’t seen a woman in years. Discovering that there’s an alien loose, Ripley asks the warden to break out the guns, and can’t believe it when she is told there aren’t any. Nor can we. Good acting has salvaged many a poor script in the past, but not here. Dance is slaughtered in the first act, as is the regulation bastard warden (Glover), leaving only Sigourney, impressive as ever, and a motley cast of extras. Though wasteful of the expensive sets, Fincher’s tight close-ups do add to the sense of claustrophobic panic.
**The end of an epic trilogy**
Everything has been said about this movie already, but let’s find out why the rating of it (on a different, shabbier website) is so low. Here are some points of a popular reviewer, who has almost 100 percent support of their readers.
1. At some points the audience is bored stiff and at other moments they are confused by the outlandish action sequences.
Outlandish action? Was it too alien? And sorry you were bored by the exceptional cinematography, underlined by a pace that was just right not to rush things, which brings me the second point.
2. …a disjointed mess that feels forced and rushed.
Story seemed linear to me. And which one is it, boring or rushed?
3. The direction is never clear and there is no real screenplay here at all.
This is just saying it was bad, without saying anything at all. How is this helpful.
4. Charles Dutton is pretty good, but his character lacks the development to really make him interesting. Everyone else is just present…
Dutton’s character needs no development. What do you want, him finding Jesus again? Dance’s backstory is interesting, and we get to know little details about everyone else like for example the IQ of one of the guards who then later unexpectedly gives his life for what he believes in, pretty strong character development for a minor player in a Sci-Fi Thriller. And that is the main problem people have when rating “Alien³”, they don’t know it’s not a horror film like “Alien” and it’s not an action flick like “Aliens”.
5. Overall a disappointment that is not very impressive at all. 2 stars out of 5.
More bashing without sound reasoning behind it. This film is clearly underrated, and if the aforementioned reviewer had seen what we have seen in 2017, especially in the Science Fiction genre, he might even agree and change his opinion about how a “disjointed mess” looks like.
I give 5 stars not to up the overall score, but because “Alien³” ends Ripley’s ordeal in a stylish and original way, without insulting the intelligence of the viewer, or rehashing previous plot lines.
4 August 2017
I am migrating my reviews from a different site which has become simply garbage. TMDB looks awesome and I look forward to be a part of it.
Not very good.
**Sorry for some spelling-misstakes** This is the worst Alien-movie. Fincher tries to mix the dark feeling in the first movie with the 100 % action of ”Aliens”. I’m sorry Dave, it’s simply doesn’t work. OK, OK. I can admit it. It is entertaining at some points, but it is just because ”Alien 3” is more of a copy of the other movies. Now, whats wrong with that picture? Everything is stolen from the other movies and you don’t feel as amused of anything any more. The actors was really, really good but that can’t save the bad script and the direction. I ( as a pure movielover ) will forever be gratefull for Fincher’s job with ”Se7en”. This is though not one of his better movies.
Don’t be afraid, I’m part of the family.
You just can’t kill that sucker and now it has Ripley.
I have to admit that this is not the best of the three I have seen. There were no weapons to fight the beast, so they had to chase it through a maze until they could trap it and annihilate it. That plan did not seem to be going well at all, as the scum-of-the-earth prisoners kept getting eaten.
Basically, Riply (Sigourney Weaver) and Dillon (Charles Dutton) have to fight this bugger themselves. Dutton was fantastic and made the movie worth watching.
Fantastic sound and, of course, marvelous monster effects, and I really thought the reanimation of the android to be especially creepy.
Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 54 min (114 min), 2 hr 25 min (145 min) (2003 Special ‘Assembly Cut’ Edition), 2 hr 18 min (138 min) (special edition)
Genre Action, Horror, Sci-Fi
Director David Fincher
Writer Dan O’Bannon, Ronald Shusett, Vincent Ward
Actors Sigourney Weaver, Charles S. Dutton, Charles Dance
Country United States, United Kingdom
Awards Nominated for 1 Oscar. 5 wins & 25 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Sound Mix 70 mm 6-Track (70 mm prints), Dolby SR (35 mm prints)
Aspect Ratio 2.20 : 1 (70 mm prints), 2.39 : 1
Camera Arriflex 765, Zeiss 765 Lenses (special effects), Panavision Panaflex Platinum, Panavision C- and E-Series Lenses
Laboratory Rank Film Laboratories, Denham, UK
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm (Eastman EXR 500T 5296), 65 mm (Eastman EXR 500T 5296)
Cinematographic Process Arri 765 (some scenes) (special effects), Panavision (anamorphic)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Eastman 5384), 70 mm (blow-up) (Eastman 5384)