#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – The biography of Ron Kovic. Paralyzed in the Vietnam war, he becomes an anti-war and pro-human rights political activist after feeling betrayed by the country he fought for.
Plot: The biography of Ron Kovic. Paralyzed in the Vietnam war, he becomes an anti-war and pro-human rights political activist after feeling betrayed by the country he fought for.
Smart Tags: #drunkenness #desert #bar #1970s #1950s #1960s #religious_mother #crying #vietnam_war_veteran #u.s._military #young_man #disillusionment #u.s._soldier #war_victim #homecoming_soldier #vietnam_war #vietnam #protesting_vietnam_war #strict_mother #disabled_veteran #return_from_war
|7.2/10 Votes: 102,258|
|7 Votes: 1236 Popularity: 16.44|
Don’t overlook the story
You’ve heard the express “can’t see the forest for the trees”, right? It refers to someone who gets so caught up in details, they miss the big picture. Reading other comments on IMDb regarding “Born on the Fourth of July”, I think people have the opposite problem with this film. So many people seem to get caught up in talking about Vietnam, war, Nixon, America, Communism, and hippies, that they totally overlook Ron Kovic.
Ron Kovic is the center of this film. In “Platoon”, war was the center, and the central character (Charlie Sheen’s Chris Taylor) was merely a POV character through whose eyes we could see war. Not so in “Born on the Fourth of July”. Vietnam is the setting, the context, and the backdrop. But Ron Kovic is the story.
Oliver Stone really understands a character arc. Look at Kovic’s life, where it starts, where it ends. The film is the journey, how he got from A to B. It is a dramatization of a life, as opposed to an actual life, but it still rings true. It feels true. It reaches an artistic level of truth, even if some literal truths are overlooked, distorted, or rearranged. That’s what Stone is trying to do. People who quibble about the facts miss the point. (This is a theme I will take up again when I review some of Stone’s other films, as Stone is constantly being bashed for historical inaccuracies.) The connections from one point to the next work admirably, and the progression is completely believable, which is quite a feat for such a dramatic change of attitude (compare to “American History X”, where the main character goes through a similar about face with scant motivation).
Anyway, what impresses me about this film is the honesty and respect with which Stone presents the opposing views of the film. Say what you want about Stone’s political beliefs, but the argument in this film is presented in a very neutral light. It’s a story about Kovic’s choices, Kovic’s politics, Kovic’s judgments. And the anti-Vietnam beliefs he finally supports in the final act are a very natural and believable outcome of the story. This film isn’t anywhere near as didactic as some people like to imagine.
The tragedy of Oliver Stone is that, because he has been so edgy, so controversial, so deliberately provocative, no one can really just sit down and, with a neutral eye, watch his films. They have become so burdened by this giant, irrelevant, political squabble. The films have been subsumed by the very issues they sought to raise. And it’s a shame, with this film especially, because it is excellent.
Tom Cruise gives possibly the greatest performance of his career (I can’t think of anything that tops it, though his performance in “Eyes Wide Shut”, for very different reasons, is just as remarkable). The script is fantastic, taking time where it needs to take time, but not overly deliberate in its approach. It’s very economical with time. It knows what each scene needs to say, and says it without any excess baggage, wasted space, or dead time. The direction is excellent, as is the editing and cinematography. The supporting cast is excellent.
But this movie would be nothing without the remarkable, heart-rending, true story of Ron Kovic. So, while we admire the technical achievement of the film, while we debate the points raised, while we enshrine or excoriate the director (as the case may be), let’s not forget the story. Let’s not get so fired up about Vietnam that we forget Ron Kovic. He is the heart and soul of this film.
One final note: I bristle when people call this an anti-war film. That really diminishes it, I think. It’s so much more than that. It’s not just saying that war is brutal, nasty, and horrific. It’s saying something far more specific about a specific war, and about the effect of that war on a specific man.
Oliver Stone directed this biographical account of Ron Kovic(played by Tom Cruise) who is an impressionable and patriotic youth convinced to enlist after a recruiter makes a stirring speech at his high school. Once there however, he finds the war not so glamorous, but chaotic and awful, where people are shooting blindly, and he is shot and paralyzed from the waist down, and must spend months recuperating in an awful hospital where he is neglected and disrespected. Upon return home, he is a changed man, disrespectful of his parents, and self destructive. After becoming homeless, he later becomes an anti-war activist, eventually protesting at the Republican National convention in the 1970’s… Though well-acted by Cruise, Kovic seems too easily caught up in whatever’s popular at the time, whether pro or anti war, or conservative vs. liberal, and film becomes overly self-righteous as a result, especially with the heavily polemic finale.
Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 25 min (145 min)
Genre Biography, Drama, War
Director Oliver Stone
Writer Ron Kovic, Oliver Stone
Actors Tom Cruise, Bryan Larkin, Raymond J. Barry
Country United States
Awards Won 2 Oscars. 15 wins & 26 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Sound Mix 70 mm 6-Track (70 mm prints), Dolby Stereo (35 mm prints)
Aspect Ratio 2.20 : 1 (70 mm prints), 2.35 : 1
Camera Panavision Panaflex Gold II, Panavision E-Series Lenses, Panavision Panaflex, Panavision C- and E-Series Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA (color), DuArt Film Laboratories Inc., New York, USA (dailies)
Film Length 3,956 m (Sweden)
Negative Format 16 mm (Eastman), 35 mm (Eastman EXR 50D 5245, 125T 5247, 400T 5295, 250D 5297, Fuji F-64D 8520)
Cinematographic Process Spherical (16 mm footage) (some shots), Super 16 (some shots), Panavision (anamorphic)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (partial blow-up) (Eastman 5384), 70 mm (blow-up) (Eastman 5384)